Legislature(2015 - 2016)

2016-04-01 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

2016-04-01                     House Journal                      Page 2019
HB 27                                                                                                                         
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March                                                               
31, 2016, calendar (page 1997), was read the third time:                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
    CS FOR SPONSOR SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO.                                                                                
    27(JUD)                                                                                                                     
    "An Act relating to the duties of the Department of Health and                                                              
    Social Services; relating to hearings on and plans for permanent                                                            
    placement of a child in need of aid; relating to school placement                                                           
    and transportation for children in foster care; relating to foster care                                                     
    transition programs; relating to emergency and temporary                                                                    
    placement of a child in need of aid; relating to transitional living                                                        
    arrangements for children in foster care; and amending Rule 17.2,                                                           
    Alaska Child in Need of Aid Rules of Procedure."                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                    
CSSSHB 27(JUD) be returned to second reading for the specific                                                                   
purpose of considering Amendment No. 1.  There being no objection,                                                              
it was so ordered.                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representatives Wilson and Gattis:                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Page 7, line 12:                                                                                                                
    Delete "a new subsection"                                                                                                   
    Insert "new subsections"                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
Page 7, following line 24:                                                                                                      
    Insert a new subsection to read:                                                                                            
         "(y)  If the department decides to allow a child to remain in                                                          
    the child's current school under (x) of this section, the department                                                        
    shall hold a meeting not more than 30 days after the date the child                                                         
    is transferred from one placement setting to another to provide an                                                          

2016-04-01                     House Journal                      Page 2020
    opportunity for the child's parents or guardian, grandparent, and                                                           
    foster parent or out-of-home caregiver to give input regarding                                                              
    whether it is in the child's best interest for the child to continue to                                                     
    attend the child's current school. The department shall notify the                                                          
    child's parents or guardian, a grandparent who is entitled to notice                                                        
    of hearings under AS 47.10.030(d), and the child's foster parent or                                                         
    out-of-home caregiver at least seven days before the meeting. The                                                           
    department may conduct a meeting under this section in person,                                                              
    by telephone, or through electronic communication."                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                    
Amendment No. 1 be adopted.  There being no objection, it was so                                                                
ordered.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 27(JUD) am was automatically in third reading.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
**The presence of Representative Tarr, who left the chamber (page                                                               
2016), was noted.                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Representative Chenault stated, that without objection, CSSSHB
27(JUD) am would be returned to second reading.                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                                
House rescind previous action in adopting Amendment No. 1.  There                                                               
being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                          
                                                                                                                                
Representative Wilson moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                    
Amendment No. 1 (page 2019) be adopted.                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
Representative Millett objected.                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered  by Representatives                                                                     
Wilson and Gattis:                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Under Page 7, following "Insert a new subsection to read:"                                                                      
    Delete "If the department decides to allow a child to remain in the                                                         
    child's current school under (x) of this section, the"                                                                      
    Insert "The"                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
Representative LeDoux moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                    
Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted.                                                                                        

2016-04-01                     House Journal                      Page 2021
Representative Millett objected and withdrew the objection.  There                                                              
being no further objection, Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was                                                                    
adopted.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
Representative Millett withdrew the objection to Amendment No. 1.                                                               
There being no further objection, Amendment No. 1 as amended was                                                                
adopted.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 27(JUD) am was automatically in third reading.                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Representative Spohnholz moved and asked unanimous consent to                                                                   
abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest.  Objection was                                                           
heard, and she was required to vote.                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that                                                                   
Representative Kawasaki be excused from a call of the House today.                                                              
There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The question being:  "Shall CSSSHB 27(JUD) am pass the House?"                                                                  
The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 27(JUD) am                                                                                                               
Third Reading                                                                                                                   
Final Passage                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  37   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  3   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Chenault, Claman, Colver, Drummond, Edgmon, Foster, Gara,                                                                
Gattis, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson,                                                                 
Keller, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz,                                                                     
Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton,                                                                
Spohnholz, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool                                                              
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Kawasaki, Stutes, Tuck                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
And so, CSSSHB 27(JUD) am passed the House.                                                                                     
                                                                                                                                
Representative Millett moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                                               
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                                                         
court rule change.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                                                
                                                                                                                                
CSSSHB 27(JUD) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for                                                                           
engrossment.